Right to Know home

Understand the issue

Disclosure with
accountability.

RTK advocates a durable public process: access to records, independent review, protection for witnesses, and lasting reform.

Start here

Questions deserve
a serious process.

UAP means unidentified anomalous phenomena. NHI means non-human intelligence. These terms frame the questions at the center of the campaign; an unidentified observation does not, by itself, establish its origin.

RTK’s governing case argues that unresolved allegations and limits on public access warrant independent scrutiny. Its proposed reforms do not require every reader to reach the same conclusion about the underlying phenomena.

The RTK framework

Four parts. One complete process.

01 /

Information

Release the record. Make UAP-related information accessible, with context and independent review.

02 /

Reckoning

Establish an honest accounting of what was concealed, how decisions were made, and who was affected.

03 /

Reconciliation

Create a fair path for people to come forward, contribute to the record, and receive appropriate protections.

04 /

Reform

Build lasting oversight and accountability so transparency survives changes in political leadership.

The legislative priorities

Build accountability
into the system.

Independent oversight & access to records

RTK advocates independent review of UAP-related information, meaningful authority to obtain records, and clear public disclosure procedures. This is a policy objective, not a statement of current law.

Protection for people who come forward

The campaign calls for stronger protections for witnesses with direct knowledge, including those in contractor environments, so testimony can enter the record through lawful channels.

A fair path to truth & reconciliation

RTK proposes an institutional accounting that encourages truthful cooperation, treats individuals fairly, and creates a basis for structural reform.

Why a file release is only one step

Access matters. RTK’s framework also asks who reviews the records, who explains their context, how witnesses are protected, and what prevents the same failures from recurring.